The Six Warning Signs
This is a member-only chapter. Log in with your Signal Over Noise membership email to continue.
Log in to readModule 5 · Section 2 of 4
The Six Warning Signs
1. Generic Superlatives Without Specifics
Your instinct flags it because: Claims sound impressive but say nothing concrete.
What you’re seeing: “This groundbreaking approach revolutionizes…” “Industry-leading solutions that transform…” “Game-changing methodology that disrupts…”
Why it happens: AI defaults to impressive-sounding language when it lacks specific details. Superlatives fill space where actual information should exist.
The fix: Replace every superlative with a specific claim you can support. “This cuts processing time from 4 hours to 15 minutes by…” says more than “This revolutionary approach…” ever could.
2. Vague Value Propositions
Your instinct flags it because: Promises sound universal enough to mean nothing.
What you’re seeing: “Unlock your potential with powerful insights.” “Transform your business with cutting-edge solutions.” “Maximize efficiency through innovative approaches.”
Why it happens: AI mirrors generic marketing language from its training data. These phrases appear frequently in B2B copy, so AI thinks they’re effective.
The fix: Make concrete claims about specific outcomes. “Stop wasting time on tasks AI can handle in seconds” says what the user actually gets.
3. Flattery Sandwiches
Your instinct flags it because: Every opinion comes wrapped in diplomatic hedging.
What you’re seeing: “While traditional methods have merit, modern approaches offer…” “Though conventional wisdom suggests X, evidence indicates…” “Despite the historical success of Y, emerging research shows…”
Why it happens: AI tries to be diplomatic and balanced to avoid controversy. It can’t commit to an opinion without acknowledging the opposite view first.
The fix: State your actual opinion. “Traditional methods are broken. Here’s what actually works…” People can handle disagreement. What they can’t handle is reading three sentences to get to one point.
4. Perfect Grammar with Zero Personality
Your instinct flags it because: Everything sounds like it was written by a committee.
What you’re seeing: “One might consider the implications of this approach.” “It would be advisable to examine the potential ramifications.” “Stakeholders should evaluate whether…”
Why it happens: AI defaults to formal correctness over conversational authenticity. It thinks professionalism requires removing personality.
The fix: Write like you talk. “Here’s why this matters more than you think” conveys the same information with actual human voice.
5. Motivational Platitudes
Your instinct flags it because: Inspiration without instruction doesn’t help anyone.
What you’re seeing: “Remember, success is a journey, not a destination.” “The only limit is your mindset.” “Embrace change and unlock unlimited potential.”
Why it happens: Motivational content dominates AI training data from business books and LinkedIn posts.
The fix: Be specific about challenges and solutions. “This is hard. No shortcuts. Here’s how to do it anyway” respects your reader’s intelligence.
6. The Balance Problem
Your instinct flags it because: Nothing signals importance — everything gets equal weight.
What you’re seeing: Every section is roughly the same length. All paragraphs span 3-4 sentences. Every topic gets comprehensive coverage. Nothing stands out as the critical point.
Why AI does this: AI doesn’t have opinions or priorities, so it gives balanced coverage to everything. It can’t distinguish between the main argument and supporting details.
The fix: Real writing has rhythm. Some points deserve three paragraphs. Some deserve one sentence. Your structure should reflect importance — not everything needs equal treatment. If your reader only remembered one thing from this piece, what should it be? Give that thing more weight.